Press "Enter" to skip to content

Food Industry Will Not Meet Net Zero Deforestation Target, Says Cargill

Grains dealer Cargill Inc. mentioned Thursday it, and the broader food trade will fail to fulfill the aim of eradicating deforestation by 2020 and vowed to do more to guard forests and native vegetation in Brazil.

Cargill’s assertion follows information showing deforestation of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, a top provider of soybeans to Cargill, increased in May to the fastest in ten years.

The world’s largest consumer manufacturers vowed in 2010 a zero net deforestation aim by 2020, set by international umbrella body the Consumer Products Forum.

“Regardless of our collective efforts, our trade will fall short of a 2020 objective to eradicate deforestation,” Ruth Kimmelshue, Cargill’s Chief Sustainability Officer, mentioned.

“The climate is altering, and there’s an urgent requirement to take steps to end deforestation,” she mentioned.

Greenpeace earlier this week stated at least 50 million hectares of forest, an area the measurement of Spain, would be destroyed in the course of the ten years the corporate commitment was legitimate.

The Consumer Products Forum stated in response; its members had performed a vital role in addressing environmental problems. Nevertheless, it said, “the forces causing deforestation are more complicated than any stakeholder recognized in 2010.”

Environmentalists have guided to the easing of environmental protections under Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro’s five-month-old administration as encouraging illegal logging in South America’s largest nation.

In addition, they say that while global complaints have centered on saving the Amazon, agriculture has led to more devastation of Brazil’s tropical savanna.

Cargill, the largest privately held U.S. firm, pledged to begin a comprehensive threat assessment of its soy supply chain and devoted $30 million to find solutions to guard forests and local vegetation in Brazil.

Mighty Earth, a global environmental campaign group, opposed the plan.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *